What are the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Cryptocurrency?
A recent update report from the Library of Congress (dated November, 2021) highlights the increase in jurisdictions that are now implementing a regulatory framework around the use of cryptocurrencies. In 2018, the report originally identified eight jurisdictions with an absolute ban and fifteen jurisdictions with an implicit ban. However, the updated November 2021 report has seen those numbers rise to nine and 42 jurisdictions, respectively.
These implicit bans prohibit banks and other financial institutions from dealing in cryptocurrencies, offering services to individuals/businesses that deal in cryptocurrencies, and banning cryptocurrency exchanges.
Why is Crypto AML Compliance so Important?
As crypto and digital currencies become more mainstream, there’s greater pressure to get anti-money laundering policies and strategies updated and standardized. In the updated November 2021 report, a total of 103 jurisdictions are identified as applying tax, AML/CTF (Anti-Money Laundering/Counter Terrorist Financing) laws to cryptocurrencies, with the vast majority applying both. These jurisdictions include the European Union Member States, with the exception of Bulgaria. Previously, in 2018, only 33 jurisdictions were found to regulate cryptocurrencies in these areas, with just five applying both tax and AML/CFT laws. This trend will continue to increase as bodies such as The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) continue to extend the application of its standards to new technologies and areas of risk.
What to Consider with Cryptocurrency AML:
Do Absolute & Implicit Bans Effectively Manage the Risks of Digital Currencies?
Despite these efforts to regulate crypto, the question still remains: is the approach of explicitly or implicitly banning the use or servicing around crypto currencies the most effective way of protecting organizations from the criminal abuse and risk exposure attributed with the digital currencies?
Historically, creating a prohibition focused regulatory framework around a particular activity does not make the challenge disappear. On the contrary, oftentimes it makes the entity, which the framework sought to protect, more prone to abuse, as it removes all protection for the parties involved, simply driving illicit activity to less regulated routes and creating further financial exclusion.
It can be argued that the current approach which some countries and individual financial institutions – with very notable exceptions – are taking to the management of cryptocurrency risk can be likened to the ongoing de-risking phenomenon impacting correspondent banking. De-risking involves removing the risk entirely, rather than managing it with appropriate policies, risk assessments and tools.
The EBA’s recent opinion piece on de-risking outlines how simply stopping access to services for a specific product, or a portion of the customer population, can be perceived as a sign of ineffective AML/TF risk management rather than the opposite. Removing the ‘risky’ customer, or banning the servicing of certain activity, does not translate to a removal of risk. Without effective risk detection in place, financial institutions are only exposing themselves to further indirect risk, which is going on undetected. This is why crypto transaction monitoring is key.
The EBA’s investigations around the reasoning and impact of de-risking to support the need for financial inclusion reinforces another trend we are seeing in the financial landscape: the decision of certain organizations to ban or remove the risk rather than accepting and managing the controlled exposure. According to the EBA, reasons to de-risk involve instances where ML/TF risks, or reputational risks, exceed an institution’s risk appetite. This is when an institution lacks the relevant knowledge or expertise to assess the risks associated with a specific business model, or when the real or expected cost of compliance exceeds generated profits.
However, by leveraging the power of organizational data and applying advanced technologies, financial institutions could mitigate risk without relying on the need to de-risk. We’ll explain how.
Can New Technologies Help De-risking Crypto?
The EBA guidelines state the need for greater engagement between Authorities and Institutions in order to keep building trust in underlying technologies, systems, and processes, and to encourage the advancement of AML/CFT controls and risk management as a suitable alternative to de-risking. This is particularly relevant to both Competent Authorities and Financial Institutions working in areas with exposure to virtual assets. When it comes to cryptocurrencies, as with other areas of the financial industry considered higher risk for ML/FT such as Correspondent Banking, applying the right tools and technologies can be more effective in combatting illicit use for tax evasion, money laundering or terrorist financing than banning the activity entirely.
“New technologies have the potential to make anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing measures faster, cheaper and more effective. They can improve the implementation of FATF Standards to advance global AML/CFT efforts, ensure financial inclusion and avoid unintended consequences.”
Opportunities & Challenges of New Technologies for AML/CFT – FATF
What are the Challenges to Crypto Transaction Monitoring?
Many global financial institutions, as well as regulatory and industry bodies, have recognized both the risk and the clear opportunity that are present in the global adoption of cryptocurrency usage. In 2021, the updated regulatory virtual asset guidance from FAFT was issued, and as a result, provided further intelligence needed to add clarity and consistency in understanding the risks – and perhaps more crucially – the steps needed to mitigate those risks. This intelligence forms the building blocks required to help institutions make better, more risk-informed decisions rather than falling back on de-risking.
Many institutions have historically favored using traditional rules-based transaction monitoring systems to tackle emerging and more complex financial crime risk typologies, which has consistently proven to be unable to adapt to new data sources, behaviors and risks.
One example related to cryptocurrency risk is the reliance on transaction monitoring systems within certain banks to identify (unknown) points of contact and fiat/crypto conversion between their customers and Cryptocurrency Exchanges. This is done by analyzing transaction narratives and looking for keywords such as ‘Kraken’, ‘Coinbase’ or the asset names themselves. Using this approach in isolation can lead to further challenges and missed risk. For example, transactions that do not contain these keywords may simply be missed, making it increasingly difficult to identify patterns of activity and build genuine risk profiles.
How to Tackle Anti-Money Laundering Compliance for Cryptocurrency:
Monitoring Crypto Transactions using Advanced Analytics
In response to the challenges of traditional monitoring, many leading financial institutions are now looking at introducing new technology and data capabilities that will both consolidate and generate intelligence from multiple sources in order to see all activity in context. For example:
- Enriching a bank’s KYC and transactional data sets with additional third-party corporate registry data and/or intelligence from the virtual asset domain
- Integrating intelligence from on-chain analytics companies
This will allow the institution to not only identify the exchanges and resolve them as entities but can flag high risk/criminal exchanges, or those with poor or no KYC (Know Your Customer) programs, overlay keywords and narrative indicators to build a better risk profile of crypto usage.
Shifting to a multi-dimensional view of risk and control by applying innovative technologies and smoothly integrating multiple data sources is the way forward, combined with applying strong KYC and KYCC (Know Your Customer’s Customer) policies from the outset.
In an ever-evolving industry landscape amidst the ongoing need and demands surrounding cross border transactions and the rapid proliferation of crypto currencies, challenges will continue to arise for financial institutions. These are based around how best to leverage existing investments in AML/CTF processes, and tools to manage new risks and typologies and keep the business growing. As such, when looking at implementing new technology to either increase effectiveness of existing tools or to replace legacy systems, financial institutions should consider the vendors’ ability to create context, adapt to new typologies seamlessly and at speed, and help business grow.
You may be interested in…

Future-Proof Your AML Investigations Using Context
Download the latest IDC infobrief to see how context can transform AML investigations and enable more effective and efficient risk management.

Why the Rapid Growth of Cryptocurrency Demands Technological Innovation
The rapid growth of cryptocurrency presents major challenges for financial institutions, tax authorities and other regulators, demanding technological innovation. Find out why in our latest article.

Closing the “Tax Gap” & Introducing New Cryptocurrency Reporting Rules with Advanced Analytics
The world’s largest tax collection agency – the IRS – is proposing an ambitious upgrading plan, including major investments in data analytics and technology. Learn more about the global impact of upgraded analytic capabilities here.

AML for Markets Webinar: The Paradigm Shift to Contextual Monitoring
Traditional transaction monitoring systems historically haven’t been properly designed for capital markets products or activity—failing to enrich, connect, and operationalize […]

Canada’s Evolving AML Landscape May Benefit from Advanced Technologies
In response to the new AML enforcement environment, find out how organizations are uplifting their compliance programs and monitoring systems.

AML Detection & Investigation Management Report: Standard Chartered Bank [Case Study]
Financial institutions across the globe are facing increasing and evolving money laundering and financial crime threats. Regulators have imposed a […]
Related Solutions

Tax Authorities
Reduce the tax gap, identify fraud and non-compliance, and operate as efficiently as possible with limited resources.

Anti-money laundering
Reveal hidden risks and detect criminal activity faster. Reduce false positives to manage the cost of compliance. And improve investigations to make faster and more consistent decisions at scale.

Customs Agencies & Border Control
Contextual Decision Intelligence enables faster decisions, increased revenue collection and enhanced compliance. The Quantexa platform enables Customs and Border agency teams to analyze data successfully, automate and accelerate decision-making, and achieve improved results.

Fraud
Identify potentially fraudulent activity by looking at people or transactions in isolation. Understand the context surrounding the organizations you do business with to make fast, accurate decisions.

Fraud, Waste & Abuse
Empower your team with the best tools available for today’s challenges to identify and prevent fraud, waste and abuse with contextual decision intelligence software.

Credit Risk
Understand your customers, their business structures and supply chains. Make better lending decisions, faster. And support digital risk transformation.

Customer Intelligence
Generate a complete view of the context around your customers and prospects to build better relationships, reduce attrition and find hidden opportunities.

Revolutionize Your Financial Crime and Fraud Detection

Investigations
Enhance the efficiency, effectiveness and consistency of your operational and complex investigations to empower your teams to expose and understand risk faster.

Master Data Management
Connect all data—internal and third party—to create a joined-up, contextual view of all the relationships between your customers and every other domain.

Compliance
See how we help to reduce costs and improve coverage for financial crime compliance.

CDO
See how our platform uses contextual analysis to turn data into a high value asset.

CIO
See how our platform uses financial crime technology to enhance your existing IT ecosystem.

Healthcare
Reduce the tax gap, identify fraud and non-compliance, and operate as efficiently as possible with limited resources.

Contextual Monitoring
Reveal hidden risks and detect criminal activity faster. Reduce false positives to manage the cost of compliance. And improve investigations to make faster and more consistent decisions at scale.

Unified CRM Solution

Know Your Customer
Reduce significant manual effort across onboarding, refreshes and remediation. Automate checks, implement continuous monitoring, and focus on contextual decision making.

Growth and Retention

Contextual Engagement
Generate a complete view of the context around your customers and prospects to build better relationships, reduce attrition and find hidden opportunities.

Data Management
Connect all data—internal and third party—to create a joined-up, contextual view of all the relationships between your customers and every other domain.

Connected Customer View
Generate a complete view of the context around your customers and prospects to build better relationships, reduce attrition and find hidden opportunities.