What the Jerome Kerviel Case Can Teach Us About Fraud Detection 10 Years Later
Written by Laura Hutton
|
Published: 3rd Jul 2018
The Kerviel Case
This month marks a decade since Jérôme Kervielwas taken into custody after being accused of perpetrating the biggest financial fraud case in history. As a trader at Société Générale, Kerviel carried out unauthorised trades to a reported value of €49.9bn. Just five days after the bank released details of Kerviel’s illicit activity, the market had experienced losses of around €5 billion.
Kerviel was sentenced to five years in prison and ordered to pay back the €5 billion that he lost. The months that followed saw blame shift around: some thought it was the work of one greedy trader, others maintained that the company, and the industry in general, encouraged the sort of competitive corporate culture that facilitated fraudulent behavior.
The bank responded to its internal crisis of negligence by implementing a new technological solution to join the dots across its control framework and proactively identify high-risk trading activity. Many leading financial institutions implemented similar solutions designed to ensure employees would not be able to do what Kerviel did without detection. The solution solved a specific problem, but inadvertently set a troublesome precedent in the way institutions would deal with similar scandals.
Temporary Solutions Enable More Fraud
Only four years later, in May 2012, it was revealed that JP Morgan trader Bruno Iksil (known as the London Whale) had carried out aggressive trading activities in the credit default swaps (CDS) market, which led to market losses of $7 billion. Just as they did after Kerviel, banks developed specific solutions to protect against this type of high-risk trading.
One month later, in June 2012, London bankers were found to have been habitually altering the interest rates they submitted to the Libor in successful attempts to appear more trustworthy than they really were. Once again, after heavy fining, banks employed more technological solutions and industry-wide regulations to prevent further Libor manipulation but failed to look at the conduct of their employees in depth.
The Current State of Regulation
So, what have we learnt in the last ten years? Well, there has been a positive shift in culture – responsibility for risk management and indeed, prevention, weighs more heavily on the shoulders of the front office. It is no longer a case of ‘let’s make money, whatever the cost’ – protection of reputation and accountability to shareholders and the public is just as important.
However, it appears that when a scandal emerges, banks implement a strategy that prevents that particular issue from happening again, but does not address wider issues of conduct. A bank must assume that no matter what culture they manage to create, they are always at risk of employee fraud. Until this is accepted, banks will remain vulnerable.
Essentially, the banks are making the same mistakes that they always have by inadvertently allowing high risk trading to go undetected until it is far too late. Solution building after each scandal complicates the monitoring space by introducing a range of overly simplistic point solutions that only respond to the immediate high-profile behaviour. Technologies already exist in this area that would allow banks to address immediate priorities, as well as leverage best-of-breed artificial intelligence and big data to protect themselves in the future without their systems quickly becoming out of date.
For any real change in the area to occur, the industry must see the merit in taking a proactive, holistic approach towards employee misconduct. It is not a regulatory box to be ticked, nor a single problem that can be solved in isolation. It is the responsibility of all banks to do everything in their power to prevent another rogue-trading scandal.
Because the question is not “if” something like the Societe Generale debacle will occur again – it’s “when.”
You may be interested in…
Creating Value For The Enterprise Using Data
In this episode, Vishal Marria, CEO at Quantexa, speaks with the Chief Data Scientist at Dun & Bradstreet, on overcoming common data challenges, digital resilience, and creating enterprise value using in AI and data & analytics.
How Danske Bank Is Adopting Data and Analytics Technology
To maximize the value of data, enterprises need the right IT infrastructure in place. In this episode, Bo Svejstrup, CIO at Danske Bank discusses resolving legacy data challenges, improving collaboration between business and IT, and the future of cloud adoption.
How Allianz Is Transforming Using Tech
Quantexa speaks with Allianz CEO to discuss the challenges of adopting technology across the enterprise, the role of data in customer-centricity, and leading transformation in the insurance industry.
New Risk Factor Guidelines to Strengthen Financial Crime Detection
The updated European money laundering and terrorist financing risk factor guidelines highlight taking into account “wider, contextual factors.” Find out how contextual decision intelligence can ensure enhanced risk detection and due diligence measures.
QuanCon 2021: Meaningful Data for Trusted Decisions
QuanCon 2021 Virtual explored compelling thought leadership from the Altimeter Group and Accenture, knockout presentations from State Street and ABN AMRO, and an in-depth show and tell on Quantexa’s new capabilities.
Tech For Good: How Standard Chartered Bank Is Revolutionizing Investigations
Learn how Standard Chartered Bank has made huge strides in harnessing the power of data to revolutionize financial crime investigations.
Better decisions start here
See how our Contextual Decision Platform transforms every operational decision you make.
Related Solutions
Tax Authorities
Reduce the tax gap, identify fraud and non-compliance, and operate as efficiently as possible with limited resources.
Anti-Money Laundering
Reveal hidden risks and detect criminal activity faster. Reduce false positives to manage the cost of compliance. And improve investigations to make faster and more consistent decisions at scale.
Customs Agencies & Border Control
Contextual Decision Intelligence enables faster decisions, increased revenue collection and enhanced compliance. The Quantexa platform enables Customs and Border agency teams to analyze data successfully, automate and accelerate decision-making, and achieve improved results.
Fraud
Identify potentially fraudulent activity by looking at people or transactions in isolation. Understand the context surrounding the organizations you do business with to make fast, accurate decisions.
Fraud, Waste & Abuse
Empower your team with the best tools available for today’s challenges to identify and prevent fraud, waste and abuse with contextual decision intelligence software.
Credit Risk
Understand your customers, their business structures and supply chains. Make better lending decisions, faster. And support digital risk transformation.
Know Your Customer
Reduce significant manual effort across onboarding, refreshes and remediation. Automate checks, implement continuous monitoring, and focus on contextual decision making.
Customer Intelligence
Generate a complete view of the context around your customers and prospects to build better relationships, reduce attrition and find hidden opportunities.
Master Data Management
Connect all data—internal and third party—to create a joined-up, contextual view of all the relationships between your customers and every other domain.
Compliance
See how we help to reduce costs and improve coverage for financial crime compliance.
CDO
See how our platform uses contextual analysis to turn data into a high value asset.
CIO
See how our platform uses financial crime technology to enhance your existing IT ecosystem.